tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-172417803867627775.post7395523482971504358..comments2023-05-18T03:50:23.681-07:00Comments on The Center for Theological Studies: Discerning A Logical Contradiction: The Philosophical Consistency of An Eternal Decree of Conditional ElectionByronhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11537490279115937176noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-172417803867627775.post-45028873336217608432011-06-17T13:06:58.365-07:002011-06-17T13:06:58.365-07:00For those who read this post, I know that my "...For those who read this post, I know that my "plot line" looks as if eternity is "broken in half" or divided, but this is not the case. Rather, the plot line exists to show that eternity has always existed before time. Rather, to adequately demonstrate eternity, there should have been a line for eternity (by itself) and then a line under the eternity line for time, as below:<br /><br /> Eternity: <------------------><br /><br /> Time: __________T_______T (final)<br /><br /> As can be seen, eternity is always extending (it has always existed). Time, however, comes into being at some logical point "T" and eventually ends (which is what the "T (final)" designation is for. All this to show that "time" exists for only a fraction of the duration of eternity. <br /><br /> I hope this may clear up some confusion (if there is any).Deidre Richardson, B.A., M.Div.https://www.blogger.com/profile/04415891901162852180noreply@blogger.com